I was just blogging the other day about, er, blogging... and a good friend in Ottawa sent me an article on blogging, which, btw, I agree with completely ... First, I'll chime in with my take on the topic of blogging...
I'm under no illusions that many read this blog... It is what it is... my meanderings. I also don't blog for the reader, although it is at play - I blog primarily for me, pure and simple. It's just another way to express myself... But as Tim Spears writes in his piece, a blog is not really as important as people think, as bloggers think. It's just an opinion at one instance in time, something that everyone has. We bloggers just happen to be in front of a computer, creating the illusion with nice fonts and graphics, dressing up these opinions as actually important and perhaps even relevant. But if you step back and boil it down, and these opinions are cheap, you can get them in any bar, train station or Starbucks...
Another myth I need to debunk... We're NOT writers. We are bloggers - and there's a huuuuge difference. We don't sweat over these entries, hell we're lucky if we remember use click on the spellchecker. Writers write and sweat, bloggers blog and giggle. One's a profession, the other's a hobby. I do believe there is an illusion out there that bloggers are important people and have an important role in society, this is true only in a blogger's mind. We're not important. I think at the end of the day, this is just an extension of our ego, and that's all. And yet another example where people take themselves waaaay too seriously in life... In the final analysis, we really don't make much more of a difference than anyone else. After all, I believe - and here's one of my favorite quotes - We are all just monkeys with car keys.... This is true for bloggers, plumbers, accountants and the guy who delivered my pizza last night..
Blog On!
Here's the article....
=====================
The illusions of blogging
Tom Spears, Ottawa Citizen
Published: Tuesday, January 30, 2007
Bloggers are the world's lonely people, marked by deep melancholy and social withdrawal, says a University of Calgary professor and, now, author.
ÓBloggers think of themselves as rebels against mainstream society but that rebellion is mostly confined to cyberspace, which makes blogging as melancholic and illusionary as Don Quixote tilting at windmills,Ô says Michael Keren.
Yesterday he launched his new book, Blogosphere: The New Political Arena, claiming it's the first book to examine weblogs. (That's his claim, not mine. I bet there are loads of such books.)
Anyhow, he thinks the power of the blog is pretty overrated, especially by those writing them.
"Weblogs promise liberation and a freedom of expression not found in any other medium," he says in an announcement about the new book. "But bloggers do not take advantage of this liberation. Bloggers have compared their writing and ideas to the great conquests in history, yet despite their excessive use of words, they conquer nothing. In the blogosphere, the death of an aging cat is on the same emotional level as an earthquake in Pakistan."
Oohh, these social scientists can be grouchy.
There was all kinds of excitement about "Iranian Girl," who publicized and criticized her government's actions in 2003, he notes. Lots of buzz inside the blog world, that is. Not much beyond that. No overthrown governments.
Keren holds a Canada Research Chair in Communication, Culture and Civil Society. I bet he hasn't discovered Dark Matter. I also know this: If I ever ran a more traditional blog -- not science, but personal stuff -- I'd hate knowing that a Canada Research Chair in Communication, Culture and Civil Society was getting paid to take it all apart and parse it.
4 comments:
Hm.
I agree with some of what's written in the sense that a person's blog is basically their journal, put on a webpage for the world to peruse. In that sense, it often has little meaning for anyone but the writer, and perhaps for close friends and family.
But, the term 'blog' has been used to lump an awful lot of online media together, and some of these journals *have* become quite influential, and have, in fact attacted some pretty high-profile writing talent.
Some of the more politically-oriented ones .. smirkingchimp, crooksandliars, and democraticunderground on the left, and freerepublic, and drudgereport on the right have actually been the catalyst for stories which have appeared and dominated broadcast and print media for some time. The John Kerry 'swiftboat' controversy originated on Matt Drudge's website .. and the James Guckert/Jeff Gannon incident with the White House press corps was first unveiled on several left-leaning political websites.
CNN devotes a block of time every day on 'The Situation Room' to blogs and online media, so, to dismiss all of it as the ramblings of lonely, socially maladjusted people is, IMHO, not accurate.
What some blogs remind me of, though, are the crazy guys I used to see at Carleton who would write these long, rambling, semi-coherent manifestos, and then photocopy them in the library and hand them out, or stick them on telephone poles. Except now, the copying is free, and the pole can be viewed by millions .. same rambling weirdness, though.
-- Chris
Hey! I resemble that remark!
PS. blog=ego is very true. But I do sweat over each of my blog entires. For me they are practice for my real writing.
Michael Karen makes the mistake of lumping all blogs together. That's every bit as valid as passing judgement on TV based on generalizations about some TV shows or, perhaps more apropos, passing judgement on the medium of books based on one author's narrow-minded and inaccurate ramblings ;-)
To be sure, there are good blogs and bad blogs, meaningful blogs and insignificant blogs. There are also those that are done just for fun, or for altruistic purposes, and there are those that are done with a profit motive.
Individuals blog. Corporations blog. Polticians blog.
To be dismissive of such a diverse and varied medium (yes, blogging is a medium) based on generalizations about a subset of that medium is just plain stupid.
Ok..Ok... I've been corrected.. Thanks Alan and Chris for the enlightenment.. My comments are more for personal blogs than the other kind...
Cheers.
Post a Comment